![]() ![]() + ABS functional and robust parts, automated, quiet, can make any geometry cannot make internal sharp edges (limit of all CNC), z depth limited, stock material costs and wastage, not automated + part size, surface finish, material choice, purchase cost At the moment I'm benchmarking a few different machines and at the end of the day it will come down to cost - might end up not buying anything! Each machine at this end of the market has distinct advantages and disadvantages - so there is no real winner: As it is mainly for internal use running costs are important. I'm looking at either a small desktop/benchtop cnc or an additive system. The machine is really very fast, the material can be expensive though, depending on the thickness but overall it is very easy to use. I preferred this process for these models as they are all two faced. ![]() the other models in the picture are SLA models. ![]() its obvious because there is only half of the peg. If you check out this posting of mine you can see a part made on the MDX-40 on the second image on the far right. you can alter the accuracy depending on how long you want to wait for your part to be finished. it gives a very accurate and smooth surface finish. Hi KQD, I use the MDX-40 for some of my prototypes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |